Recently, a 30-day ceasefire proposal was introduced. Ukraine agreed to it, but Russia has not. Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, previously urged Russia for an immediate ceasefire, but Putin rejected it, seeking better terms. Now, Trump’s direct involvement has sparked hope and skepticism about whether his rapport with Putin can lead to progress in the nation.

The issue of land ownership is highly sensitive. Ukraine insists it won’t give up any territory, while Russia refuses to withdraw from areas it controls. President Zelenskyy has made it clear that peace is only possible if Russian troops leave entirely. If Trump suggests Ukraine cede land for peace, it could trigger a diplomatic crisis, with Ukraine and its allies likely rejecting such a deal.

Control over power plants is another critical matter. Russia has targeted Ukraine’s energy infrastructure throughout the war, and holding facilities like Zaporizhzhia gives it significant leverage. If Trump’s talks result in Russia keeping control of these assets, Ukraine would strongly oppose it, as regaining energy control is crucial for its security and rebuilding efforts.

Global leaders have mixed reactions to Trump’s involvement. Many European nations are cautious, given his history of being more lenient toward Putin. Some fear his focus might be on ending the war quickly rather than ensuring a fair resolution that protects Ukraine’s sovereignty. There’s also concern that his actions could undermine international efforts to hold Russia accountable for its invasion.

As the meeting date approaches, the world is watching closely. If Trump’s negotiations lead to an agreement, it could change the course of the war. However, if the terms favor Russia or compromise Ukraine’s independence, it could escalate tensions and resistance from Ukraine and its allies. The outcome of these talks will determine whether Trump’s approach brings meaningful progress or adds complexity to the conflict.

For more articles visit  The India Moves